$ agit // control plane

You don't have to understand plans.
Your questions are about money and dates. So are our answers.

This page is for owners and executives who are not IT people. No «declarative plans» or «dependency graphs» here. Only what changes for you: when the money arrives, what is slipping, and how you find out.

Three questions

How much are you owed on your current projects over the next three months?
Which of those amounts are you sure will arrive on time?
How do you know?The honest answer is almost always: «the manager said so» or «gut feeling».

If your answer to the third question was «the manager said so» — read on. A manager says «everything's fine» until it is impossible to hide. Not because they're bad — because they're human.

One sentence — what AG.it does

AG.it replaces «the manager said so» with «the system computed it and can prove it». You learn that a milestone is slipping — and its payment with it — a month early, while you can still call and renegotiate, not after the money fails to arrive.

How this differs from «we already have a good plan»

Printed route → navigator

A good classical plan is a printed route: perfect at the moment of printingAG.it is a navigator: it watches actual movement and recomputes the arrival time every day. It says «you'll be 40 minutes late» an hour before the meeting, not after it.

«How are you?» → heart monitor

A status report is asking the patient «how are you?» — «fine», right up to the heart attackAG.it doesn't ask people — it watches facts: closed tasks, acceptances, payments. Nobody writes the reports, so nobody lies in them.

Tested on a real project

In 2025 we took a real commercial project — a SaaS platform rollout (loyalty, analytics, communications) where payment is tied to stage acceptance. The system got nothing but plan exports — three files, exactly as they were in May and June. No interviews, no access to correspondence.

+33 daysthe computed slip — the project lead's own report said «about a month behind»
to the rublethe computed monthly cost of the slip matched the lead's handwritten estimate
2 of 2module launch forecasts matched the lead's expectations to the month

The difference is one thing: the lead wrote that by hand at the end of June. The system said the same from the May export — a month earlier, without asking a single person.

The usual objections

«We already have plans and reports»

Reports are written by people who benefit from looking good. AG.it doesn't write reports — it computes them from facts. It has nothing to lie with.

«My managers will tell me if something's wrong»

They will — once it's impossible to hide. In the project above that happened a month later than the system computed. A month is the difference between «renegotiated» and «lost the money». And if a project goes quiet and facts stop arriving, the system flags that too: silence is also a signal.

«Another system — the team won't adopt it»

We don't touch the team. People keep working where they work — Jira, Excel, spreadsheets. We take the exports and compute on top. Adoption means sending a file.

«Our payments aren't tied to stages»

Then honestly: AG.it delivers the most where money rides on acceptance of results — integrators, contract development, project work. If your economics are different, we won't pretend this is «for everyone».

«Rollout is long and expensive»

The pilot is 48 hours on your export, free. The first screen of your project takes ~10 minutes. If it doesn't match your sense of reality — we part ways without an invoice.

Test it on your own project
Send a task export (CSV/XLSX) — within 48 hours we'll show which money is secured, which is promised and which is at risk, with the facts behind every status one click away.
Message on Telegram →
Altered Graph.it · the numbers above are from a real project; names and amounts stay private.How it's proven → · Product one-pager →